EU seeks Iran compromise as nuke talks kick off

AP

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, left, smiles, as Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili walks away, after a photo call at a start of high-level talks between world powers and Iranian officials in Almaty, Kazakhstan on Friday, April 5, 2013.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The six have moved from demanding a total end to enrichment.

ALMATY: Six nations and Iran worked Friday to find common ground at negotiations that would satisfy both Tehran's demands for international recognition of its right to advanced nuclear technology and world concerns that the Islamic Republic wants to misuse that expertise to make

atomic arms.

The two sides parted in February after a previous meeting in the Kazakh city of Almaty with agreement to at least keep talking over a new proposal submitted by the six — the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany. But they remain vastly divided on what they want from each other.

Iran wants an end to punishing sanctions crippling its economy. They were imposed to force it to end uranium enrichment, a process that can generate both nuclear energy and the core of nuclear weapons. Iran denies any interest in atomic arms, insists its enrichment program serves only peaceful needs, says it has a right to enrich under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and describes U.N. Security Council demands that it stop enrichment as illegal.

"We are talking about peaceful nuclear energy," Saeed Jalili, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, said before the two sides sat down Friday at one of the city's five-star hotels. He said Iran had a right to such a program and accused "a handful of countries" of working "to deny this right to others."

The six have moved from demanding a total end to enrichment. As a first step, they now are asking Tehran only to stop production and stockpiling of uranium enriched to 20 percent, which is just a technical step away from weapons-grade uranium. A halt to production and stockpiling would keep Iran's supply below the amount needed for further processing into a weapon.

Ahead of the meeting an EU official speaking for the six world powers said Friday the onus was on Iran to engage on the six-nation offer, which foresees a lifting of some sanctions but keeps penalties crippling Iran's oil sales and economy in place.

"What we are hoping for is that Tehran will come back to us today with a clear and concrete response," said Michael Mann.

"The core issue here is the international community concern of the very strong indications that Iran is developing technology that could be used for military purposes," said Mann, spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, the formal convener of the talks.

"There are suspicions of an enrichment program that could have military uses," he said. "The confidence building has to come from Iran because it is Iran that is developing its nuclear program."

Ahead of Friday's session, a senior U.S. administration official suggested more punitive sanctions will be imposed if "Iran does not begin to take concrete steps and concrete actions to meet international concerns." The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of U.S. government rules on background briefings with reporters.

The meeting broke for lunch after about three hours with no indication whether progress had been made.

The meetings Friday and Saturday are at best expected to achieve enough progress for agreement to hold another round of talks. But after 10 years of inconclusive negotiations, even an agreement to keep talking would give both sides short-term gains.

It would leave the international community with some breathing space in its efforts to stem Iran's nuclear advance. For Tehran, continued negotiations are insurance that neither Israel nor the United States will feel the need to act on threats to move from diplomacy to other means to deal with Iran.

Israel says Iran is only a few months away from the threshold of having material to turn into a bomb and has vowed to use all means to prevent it from reaching that point. The United States has not said what its "red line" is, but has said it will not tolerate an Iran armed with nuclear weapons.

Any strike on Iran would provoke fierce retaliation directly from Iran and through its Middle East proxies in Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, raising the specter of a larger Middle East conflict.